Monday, November 29, 2010

Keep Kicking Until it Stops Moving


Never one to shy away after stealing a good idea, I thought I'd take the count breakdown idea from the post below and re-purpose it. Instead of looking at pitchers and how they handle counts, why not look at how hitters are pitched by count?

Travis Snider is the candidate at the front of my mind because Travis Snider is the most important batter on the team. Sort of.

The development of Travis Snider is near the top of the "Things Crucial to the Fate of the Franchise" list. Not at the top, but near. What better way to learn how Snider is developing than to examine how he is pitched.

You might notice some tweaks to last week's version of the below graph. All the offspeed pitches are grouped at the bottom. I chopped out a few pitches which barely registered, generally pitches with the word "knuckle" prominently involved. I grouped the sinkers and two seamers, feel free to cast insults in the comment section.



Call me crazy, but learning American League pitchers treat Travis Snider the same way when the count is 0-1 as 1-1 worries me. Isn't 1-1 the biggest pitch of the at bat? I'm moderately shocked he sees that much junk in a 1-1 count. Could this be the window into a tortured soul?

Aside from that, does anything jump out? When pitchers are ahead of Snider, he sees a pretty even mix of breaking balls/offspeed and fastballs. Enough to keep him guessing, we can assume. Lots of heat in full counts, interestingly enough.

One thing I came across as I "researched" this post was Snider faced only eight 3-0 counts all season. Eight! That says, to me, if you throw Travis Snider as strike, he will swing at it. Though he walk rate was down in 2010, Snider's career shows he will walk, so that's good.

While this exercise hardly helps project Snider into 2011 and beyond, it shows me how hard being a big league hitter must be. While Cito's "Have a Plan" approach works for some, I worry over simplifying something staggeringly complex won't work for all. But what does. Anyway, let me know what you think about this in the comments, if you feel obliged.

Data courtesy of Joe Lefkowitz, image courtesy of The Fox is Black

7 comments:

  1. These graphs are totally awesome. They take me like 1/2 hour to understand, which is great when there is nothing else baseball-related to do.

    That aside, I still think Snider will begin to pick up on the combinations that MLB pitchers throw, especially with Farrell providing insight as an opponent's strategy against him.

    I agree that he is one of the key players going forward. Him, and Adam Lind. get them both hot at the same time, and BOOM.

    ReplyDelete
  2. *as to an opponent's strategy against him.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Looks pretty simple to me. All Lunchbox needs to do is to work the count to 3-0 or 3-1 and then sit fastball. Hopefully he reads this and, using this insanely simple strategy next year, wins the triple crown and MVP while hitting 94 homeruns.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Snider faced only eight 3-0 counts all season. Eight! That says, to me, if you throw Travis Snider as strike, he will swing at it."

    I don't follow? This says to me that regardless of whether the pitcher throws balls or strikes, Snider will swing at one of the first 3 pitches.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @Peter D - Good point. I guess it should read "if you get to 2-0 on Travis Snider, he is balls to the wall on that fastball."

    ReplyDelete
  6. Come to think of it, I seem to recall a few times where it was obvious Snider was guessing fastball and he wasn't even close.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Great post.

    While this exercise hardly helps project Snider into 2011 and beyond, it shows me how hard being a big league hitter must be.

    Snider's not yet 23. Can't wait for 2011.

    ReplyDelete

Send forth the witticisms from on high